The Gospel

Saturday, September 27, 2008

A Book recommended by Ligon Duncan concerning those headed off to college during his sermon addressing postmodernism

sire_chris_larger.jpg

An example of Edwards



unknown.jpg

 Edwards is well known as perhaps the greatest theologian the United States has ever produced. He is equally noted for his preaching and writing. But in this Long Line Profile, Dr. Steven J. Lawson considers the unique focus and commitment with which Edwards sought to live out the Christian faith. 

Lawson examines Edwards’ life through the lens of the seventy resolutions he penned in his late teens, shortly after his conversion. Lawson is quick to note that in writing these resolutions, Edwards was not merely seeking to bolster his own determination. As Edwards himself said before writing the first resolution, “Being sensible that I am unable to do anything without God’s help, I do humbly entreat him by his grace to enable me to keep these resolutions . . . for Christ’s sake.” Edwards knew he would never keep his resolutions in his own strength.

The resolutions cover everything from glorifying God to repenting of sin to managing time. Drawing on Edwards’ writings, as well as scholarly accounts of Edwards’ life and thought, Lawson shows how Edwards sought to live out these lofty goals he set for the management of his walk with Christ. In Edwards’ example, he finds helpful instruction for all believers.


Hardcover 5.25 x 7.5 | 200 Pages 
ISBN 1-56769-108-0 | Releases November 2008 

CAN CALVINISTS AND ARMINIANS FELLOWSHIP IN A LOCAL CHURCH?

ligonier.jpg

Ligonier West Coast Conference - Q&A Session II

September 27, 2008 @ 1:55 PM  |  Posted By: Alex Chediak
DOES RESPONSIBILITY EQUAL ABILITY?

One asked:  "How can man be responsible to believe in Jesus Christ if he is not able to do so?" 

The response was that man is unable to believe in Christ, but he is responsible for that inability.  The command that people repent and believe remains.  Dr. Duncan referred us to Martin Luther's 
The Bondage of The Will.  Also, see the objection that Paul anticipates in Romans 9.  

CAN CALVINISTS AND ARMINIANS FELLOWSHIP IN A LOCAL CHURCH?

Another asked how we can maintain fellowship with Arminians in a local church setting.  Dr. Duncan responded that we ought to adorn our doctrine with love and grace, but we ought not to equivocate on what we believe.  Dr. Sproul noted that historically the Calvinism-Arminianism debate has been understood as an "intramural" debate--a debate among fellow Christians. But extreme forms (like open theism) preclude fellowship.  If someone wants to join a Calvinistic church and wants to simultaneously spread the word that Calvinists are "heratics", that person will disturb the peace of that church.  Such a situation should be avoided.  But many Arminians, Dr. Sproul noted, are well-intentioned in their attempts to reconcile human volition and divine sovereignty. 


CLASSICAL APOLOGETICS UNPOPULAR AMONG REFORMED CHRISTIANS?


Sproul acknowledged that presuppositional apologetics is the majority report, but he is not sure why.  Presuppositional apologetics is "easier" and requires "less thought", since it allows us to simply tell the non-Christian that he has the "wrong presuppositions" (and that he needs to start with the presupposition that God exists, etc.).  Both Ligon Duncan and R.C. Sproul hold to classical apologetics view (as did Hodge, Warfield, and many others).  

DOUBLE PREDESTINATION

Sproul rejected the "equal ultimacy" view (whereby God symmetrically acts in the lives of both the elect and the reprobate--
actively softening the elect and actively hardening the reprobate).  Rather, God positively (actively) intervenes in the life of the elect.  However, he leaves the reprobate (passively) to their own devices.  Double predestination is asymmetrical.  He does not create fresh evil in the hearts of the reprobate.  They are already sinful and heading away from God.  They need no assistance in doing so.

EVANGELISM

A woman noted that as an Arminian evangelizing was easier and simpler.  Now, as a Calvinist, she feels that she has a ton to say to a non-Christian, and she doesn't know how to condense it into a brief word. 

Dr. Sproul responded that in a brief period of time we can talk to people about the holiness of God, and (hence) our unholiness, and (hence) our manifest need for a Savior. Also, the apostles in Acts give us a great model for evangelism. John MacArthur spoke of the thief on the cross, the only person to whom Jesus granted assurance of salvation. That man, in a relatively short period of time acknowledged Jesus was going to outlive the crucifixion, enter a kingdom, and that he was going to face judgment. He had a lot of sound theology.  John suggested we first go after the sin issue and then the offer of forgiveness in Christ.  Evangelistically, we should look for those in whom God is doing a work of conviction regarding sin, righteousness, and judgment. 

DEALING WITH MORMONS


Go after the works issue (salvation by works -- at least to the "highest levels of heaven"), go after the polytheism issue.  They are anything but Christians.  Duncan noted that they "play it both ways": they teach that evangelical Christians have corrupt teaching and that they (Mormons) alone have the "true teaching," but then they turn around and want to give every appearance of being just like evangelicals. 

SAVED THROUGH CHILD-BEARING? (I TIM 2:15)

Dr. MacArthur noted that women are "saved" from any stigma that comes from society in their (God-honoring) decision to invest in the lives of their young children.  

LIMITED ATONEMENT

The issue is what was God's intention in sending His son to die for sinners?  Was God's desire to make salvation possible for everyone, but guaranteed for nobody?  Or was it to guarantee the salvation of the elect?  So the death of Christ is sufficient for every person to be saved, but it is efficient (effective) for the salvation of the elect [and the latter was God's intention]. 

John pointed to the verse "Savior of all, especially those who believe."  God is a Savior at heart.  He grants common grace for the non-Christian.  He preserves lives.  He tells Adam "on the day you eat, you shall surely die" --- but then allows Adam to live 900 years.  [If "savior" is 
eternal in this verse, then you have universalism in the first half of the verse, and you cannot explain the second.]

BIRTH CONTROL

Is it OK?  Sproul noted that some forms of birth control are abortive, and these are not OK.  Beyond that, Sproul noted that he (personally) is concerned with a pro-birth control mentality which says "children are a burden, we do not welcome them."  So he is uncomfortable with its widespread use (even in its conception-prevention forms).  John noted that when God gave women a cycle whereby they can only conceive children at certain times each month, He was granting us a measure of control over how many children to have.  And it is a decision that couples need to make together before the Lord.

Gospel Preaching Commanded by A. W. Pink

                                                                      pink1.jpg

From a sermon preached in Sydney during his Australian ministry in the 1920’s.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

How to Communicate the Gospel

The truth of the gospel is the principle article of all Christian doctrine . . . Most necessary is it that we know this article well, teach it to others and beat it into their heads continually. Martin Luther

A Voice in Pleasant Hill


Man accused of stabbing passerby in Pleasant Hill
By Roman GokhmanContra Costa Times

WALNUT CREEK — Police arrested a Walnut Creek man they believe stabbed a passerby at random and possibly himself Monday evening in the 1800 block of Oak Park Boulevard.
Sean Howard Sebastian Loveday, 18, was arrested on suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon. He was taken to a hospital to be treated for several stab wounds to his stomach.
The incident occurred about 7 p.m., Walnut Creek police Lt. Mark Covington said.
Walnut Creek police received a report of a young man — identified as Loveday — who had run out of a house on McNutt Avenue with a knife, Covington said. By the time police responded, the man had run one block north to Oak Park Boulevard, which is in Pleasant Hill.
There, he confronted a man on a bicycle whom he did not know, Pleasant Hill police Lt. Dan Connelly said. After a brief argument, Loveday stabbed the victim and ran east, where he confronted a herald of righteousness. A voice shouting in the wilderness, "REPENT, REPENT." The man caught off guard stood in the middle of street causing oncoming traffic to come to a stop. "When I saw Loveday look back at me, it seemed as if he was overcome by the evil one," the Baptist said. The Baptist also stated, "He then began to stab himself repeatedly in the stomach and thigh area, I was waiting for him to drop." Then after no further hesitation the Baptist ran back to his house to go grab his anointing oil and came out to find an off-duty Contra Costa sheriff's deputy.
"He identified himself as a deputy, ordered the suspect to stop and the suspect complied," Connelly said
Pleasant Hill police arrived and arrested Loveday. Both he and the victim were taken to a hospital with non-life threatening injuries. The Baptist in his final statement to an on-scene reporter said,"Unless you repent, you will likewise perish." He returned to his wife and two children across the street where he resides.

Monday, September 22, 2008

2009 Resolved Conference: SIN


In a strange and wonderful irony, the greatest problem on Earth is resolved by the greatest reality in Heaven.
Sin—it is the poisonous nature of humanity. The depth and breadth of sin is evident everywhere in our world. It is the fundamental principle in every person and the driving momentum of every society. From our first parents in Eden to infants drawing their first breath this day, every human is infected with sin's rebellion against God and His Word. As the Christmas carol languishes, "long lay the world in sin and error pining."
"But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us" (Romans 5:8). This is the reality from Heaven that resolves sin. The gospel of Jesus Christ is God’s amazing and solitary resolution for sin and sinners. The death of Jesus stands forever as God's most glorious act. And it was for the purpose of defeating sin.
Resolved 2009 will focus on sin. What is sin? How bad is it? Where did it come from? How can I be saved from it and its consequences? Is it possible to stop? Our 5th Resolved Conference will explore these questions and provide biblical answers.
John Owen wrote, "Be killing sin, or it will be killing you." Join us at Resolved '09 as we rally to understand and battle sin.
Conference Essentials
Dates: June 12th-15th
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Confirmed Speakers
John MacArthur
Rick Holland
Steve Lawson
C.J. Mahaney
John Piper

A Gospel of Power

One of the most dramatic moments in my life for the shaping of my theology took place in a seminary classroom. One of my professors went to the blackboard and wrote these words in bold letters: “Regeneration Precedes Faith.”
These words were a shock to my system. I had entered seminary believing that the key work of man to effect rebirth was faith. I thought that we first had to believe in Christ in order to be born again. I use the words in order here for a reason. I was thinking in terms of steps that must be taken in a certain sequence. I had put faith at the beginning. The order looked something like this:
“Faith - rebirth -justification.”I hadn’t thought that matter through very carefully. Nor had I listened carefully to Jesus’ words to Nicodemus. I assumed that even though I was a sinner, a person born of the flesh and living in the flesh, I still had a little island of righteousness, a tiny deposit of spiritual power left within my soul to enable me to respond to the Gospel on my own. Perhaps I had been confused by the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church. Rome, and many other branches of Christendom, had taught that regeneration is gracious; it cannot happen apart from the help of God.
No man has the power to raise himself from spiritual death. Divine assistance is necessary. This grace, according to Rome, comes in the form of what is called prevenient grace. “Prevenient” means that which comes from something else. Rome adds to this prevenient grace the requirement that we must “cooperate with it and assent to it” before it can take hold in our hearts.
This concept of cooperation is at best a half-truth. Yes, the faith we exercise is our faith. God does not do the believing for us. When I respond to Christ, it is my response, my faith, my trust that is being exercised. The issue, however, goes deeper. The question still remains: “Do I cooperate with God’s grace before I am born again, or does the cooperation occur after?” Another way of asking this question is to ask if regeneration is monergistic or synergistic. Is it operative or cooperative? Is it effectual or dependent? Some of these words are theological terms that require further explanation.
A monergistic work is a work produced singly, by one person. The prefix mono means one. The word erg refers to a unit of work. Words like energy are built upon this root. A synergistic work is one that involves cooperation between two or more persons or things. The prefix syn -
means “together with.” I labor this distinction for a reason. The debate between Rome and Luther hung on this single point. At issue was this: Is regeneration a monergistic work of God or a synergistic work that requires cooperation between man and God? When my professor wrote “Regeneration precedes faith” on the blackboard, he was clearly siding with the monergistic answer. After a person is regenerated, that person cooperates by exercising faith and trust. But the first step is the work of God and of God alone.
The reason we do not cooperate with regenerating grace before it acts upon us and in us is because we can- not. We cannot because we are spiritually dead. We can no more assist the Holy Spirit in the quickening of our souls to spiritual life than Lazarus could help Jesus raise him for the dead.
When I began to wrestle with the Professor’s argument, I was surprised to learn that his strange-sounding teaching was not novel. Augustine, Martin Luther, John Calvin, Jonathan Edwards, George Whitefield - even the great medieval theologian Thomas Aquinas taught this doctrine. Thomas Aquinas is the Doctor Angelicus of the Roman Catholic Church. For centuries his theological teaching was accepted as official dogma by most Catholics. So he was the last person I expected to hold such a view of regeneration. Yet Aquinas insisted that regenerating grace is operative grace, not cooperative grace. Aquinas spoke of prevenient grace, but he spoke of a grace that comes before faith, which is regeneration.
These giants of Christian history derived their view from Holy Scripture. The key phrase in Paul’s Letter to the Ephesians is this: “…even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace have you been saved)” (Eph. 2:5). Here Paul locates the time when regeneration occurs. It takes place ‘when we were dead.’ With one thunderbolt of apostolic revelation all attempts to give the initiative in regeneration to man are smashed. Again, dead men do not cooperate with grace. Unless regeneration takes place first, there is no possibility of faith.
This says nothing different from what Jesus said to Nicodemus. Unless a man is born again first, he cannot possibly see or enter the kingdom of God. If we believe that faith precedes regeneration, then we set our thinking and therefore ourselves in direct opposition not only to giants of Christian history but also to the teaching of Paul and of our Lord Himself.- R.C. Sproul, “The Mystery of the Holy Spirit”

Please Take the Time to Find Out

The audience was in shock then and many audiences continue to be shocked by it today.

The Most Terrifying Truth of Scripture